Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kışlatma Öncesi Farklı Polen Diyetleri ile Beslenen Bal Arısı Kolonilerinin Ekonomik Analizi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2, 217 - 227, 29.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1173055

Öz

Beslenme her canlı için bir zorunluluktur. Bal arıları normal koşullarda besin madde ihtiyaçlarını doğal floral kaynaklardan karşılamaktadır. Yetersiz floral kaynakların olduğu durumlarda ise koloniler için ek besleme yapılması gereklidir. Bu çalışmada sonbahar döneminde eşit güçte hazırlanan kolonilere farklı protein diyetlerinin ve erken bahara kadar ihtiyaç duyulan karbonhidratın (şeker-su karışımı) verilmesiyle oluşan ek besleme modellerinin ekonomik analizi yapılmıştır. Besleme denemesi her grupta 8 koloni olacak şekilde 6 grup ve toplam 48 koloni üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Deneme grupları haşhaş poleni, pamucak poleni, karışık polen, arı keki, şurup ve kontrol olmak üzere altı farklı gruptan oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada deneme grupları için kovan başına üretim masrafları ortaya konulduktan sonra kovan başına arılı çerçeve değerlerinin üretim masraflarını karşılayıp karşılamadığına bakılmıştır. Kış öncesi, kış ve erken ilkbahar dönemlerinin sonuçları birlikte değerlendirildiğinde, haşhaş poleni ile yapılan beslemenin diğer besleme gruplarına göre biraz daha avantajlı olduğu söylenebilir. Haşhaş poleni ile yapılan beslemede kovan başına arılı çerçeve değerinin üretim masrafını karşılama oranları kış öncesinde %40,65, kış döneminde %102,98 ve erken ilkbahar döneminde %98,66 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Nisbi karlılık açısından haşhaş polenine en yakın olan protein diyeti pamucak polenidir. Diğer besleme gruplarında ise nisbi karlılık haşhaş ve pamucak poleni ile yapılan deneme grubundan daha düşük bulunmuştur.

Destekleyen Kurum

TARIM VE ORMAN BAKANLIĞI Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü

Proje Numarası

TAGEM/HAYSÜD/B/20/A4/P5/1890

Teşekkür

Bu makale TC Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğü tarafından desteklenen “BAL ARILARININ POLEN TERCİHLERİ VE KIŞLATMADA POLEN KULLANIMININ KOLONİ DİNAMİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ” isimli projeden üretilmiştir. TARIM VE ORMAN BAKANLIĞI Tarımsal Araştırmalar ve Politikalar Genel Müdürlüğüne ve Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü'ne desteklerinden dolayı teşekkür ederiz.

Kaynakça

  • Adanacıoglu, H., M. Kosoglu, G. Saner, E. Topal, B. Yucel. 2019. Economic feasibility of package beekeeping application in Turkey: A case study of Edirne province. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 25(5): 651-658.
  • Aksoy, A., M.M. Sarı, and M. Terin. 2017. Economic structure of beekeeping sector in Erzurum Province. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 434-440.
  • Akyol, E., H. Yeninar, N. Sahinler, and A. Guler A. 2006. The effects of additive feeding and feed additives before wintering on honey bee colony performances, wintering abilities and survival rates at the East Mediterranean region. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 9(4): 589-592.
  • Aleskerova, Y., and V. Todosiichuk. 2021. Analysis of economic aspects of organic beekeeping production. Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal. 2(1): 1-9.
  • Bianca, P.C., I. Marioara, and P.A. Aurora. 2011. Economic diagnosis of beekeeping in the North West region of Romania: a case study of Cluj County. Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Fascicula Ecotoxicologie, Zootehnie şi Tehnologii de Industrie alimentară. 10: 279-287.
  • Bixby, M., K. Baylis, S.E. Hoover, R.W. Currie, A.P. Melathopoulos, S.F. Pernal, L.J. Foster, and M.M. Guarna. 2017. A bio-economic case study of Canadian honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies: Marker-assisted selection (MAS) in queen breeding affects beekeeper profits. J Econ Entomol. 110: 816-825.
  • Blanc, S., F. Brun, G. Di Vita, and A. Mosso. 2018. Traditional beekeeping in rural areas: Profitability analysis and feasibility of pollination service. Qual. Access Success. 19: 72-79.
  • Bryś, M.S., P. Skowronek, and A. Strachecka. 2021. Pollen diet-properties and impact on a bee colony. Insects. 12(9), 798: 1-9.
  • Cejvanovic, F., Z. Grgic, A., Maksimovic, and D. Bicanic. 2011. Assumptions of economic model for sustainable productions of beekeeping in the Bosnia and Hercegovina. J. Agricultural Sci. Technol. 5(4): 481-485.
  • Cengiz, M.M., and C. Dülger. 2018. Gezginci ve sabit arıcılık işletmelerinde kontrollü şartlarda yetiştirilen ana arılarla oluşturulan balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) kolonilerinin bazı fizyolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 13(1): 19-27.
  • Ceyhan, V., and S. Canan. 2017. Türkiye Arıcılarının koloni yönetim sistemleri itibariyle ekonomik performansı. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 516-522.
  • Islam, N., R. Mahmood, G. Sarwar, S. Ahmad, and S. Abid. 2020. Development of pollen substitute diets for Apis mellifera ligustica colonies and their impact on brood development and honey production. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 33(2): 381-388.
  • Jeločnik, M., B. Bekić, and J. Subić. 2013. Contribution margin in the mobile beekeeping on the territory of Pančevo city. Ekonomika. 59(2): 73-82.
  • Koprivlenski, V., V. Dirimanova, and V. Agapieva. 2015. Economic analysis of state and development of beekeeping in Bulgaria. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 15(2): 167-170.
  • Kumar, M., D.P. Abrol, D. Sharma, U.S. Vikram, and A.K.Singh. 2021. Impact of artificial diets on performance of Apis mellifera colonies during dearth periods. J Entomol Zool Stud. 9(3):404-409.
  • Kumar, R., and O.P. Agrawal. 2014. Comparative performance of honeybee colonies fed with artificial diets in Gwalior & Panchkula region. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2(5):104-107.
  • Leonhardt, S.D., N. Gallai, L.A. Garibaldi, M. Kuhlmann, and A.M. Klein. 2013. Economic gain, stability of pollination and bee diversity decrease from southern to northern Europe. Basic Appl. Ecol. 14: 461-471.
  • Makri, P., P. Papanagiotou, and E. Papanagiotou. 2015. Efficiency and economic analysis of Greek beekeeping farms. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 21(3): 479-484.
  • Paray, B.A., I. Kumari, Y.A. Hajam, B. Sharma, R. Kumar, M.F. Albeshr, M.A. Farah, and J.M. Khan. 2021. Honeybee nutrition and pollen substitutes: A review. Saudi J Biol Sci. 28(1):1167-1176.
  • Pilati, L., and P. Fontana P. 2018. Sequencing the movements of honey bee colonies between the forage sites with the microeconomic model of the migratory beekeeper. pp. 1-20. In: R.E. Rebolledo Ranz (Ed). Apiculture, IntechOpen, London.
  • Saner, G., S. Engindeniz, B. Tolon, and F. Cukur. 2004. The economic analysis of beekeeping enterprise in sustainable development: The case study of Turkey. Apiacta. 38: 342-351.
  • Sihang, R.C., and M. Gupta. 2013. Testing the Effects of Some Pollen Substitute Diets on Colony Build up and Economics of Beekeeping with Apis mellifera L. J Entomol. 10(3): 120-135.
  • Somerville, D. 2000. Honey bee nutrition and supplementary feeding. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/117494/honey-bee-nutrition-supplementary-feeding.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022).
  • Somerville, D. 2010. Wintering bees. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/331697/ Wintering-bees.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022.
  • Thrasyvoulou, A. 1998. Practical apiculture. Melissokomiki epitheorisi. Apicultural Review. Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Topal, E., B. Yücel, R. İvgin Tunca, and M. Kösoğlu. 2019. Bal arılarında beslemenin koloni dinamiği üzerine etkileri. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 9(4): 2398-2408.
  • Ullah, A., M.F. Shahzad, I. Jamshaid, and M.S. Baloch. 2021. Nutritional effects of supplementary diets on brood development, biological activities and honey production of Apis mellifera L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28(12): 6861-6868.
  • Vaziritabar, S., and S.M. Esmaeilzade. 2016. Profitability and socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and honey production in Karaj state, Iran. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 4(4): 1341-1350.
  • Vercelli, M., L. Croce, and T. Mancuso. 2020. An economic approach to assess the annual stock in beekeeping farms: The honey bee colony inventory tool. Sustainability. 12(21), 9258: 1-14.
  • Vrabcová, P., and M. Hájek. 2020. The economic value of the ecosystem services of beekeeping in the Czech Republic. Sustainability. 12(23), 10179: 1-11.
  • Zalilova, Z.A., A.G. Mannapov, M.T. Lukyanova, and V.A. Kovshov. 2021. Strategies of regional economic and sustainable development: The case of the beekeeping industry. pp. 855-862. In: A.V. Bogoviz (Ed.). The Challenge of Sustainability in Agricultural Systems, Springer, Cham.

Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed with Different Pollen Diets before Wintering

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2, 217 - 227, 29.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1173055

Öz

Nutrition is a requirement for the survival of every living organism. Under normal conditions, honeybees meet their nutritional needs from natural floral sources. In cases where there are insufficient floral resources, additional feeding is required for the colonies. In this study, economic analysis of supplementary feeding models formed by giving different protein diets and carbohydrate (sugar-water mixture) needed until early spring to colonies prepared with equal strength in the autumn period was performed. The feeding experiment was carried out on 6 groups with 8 colonies in each group and a total of 48 colonies. Experimental groups were as follows: Papaver somniforum pollen, Cistus creticus pollen, mixed pollen, bee cake, syrup, and control. In this study, after determining the production costs per hive for the experimental groups, it was analyzed whether the bee frame values per hive cover the production costs. It could be concluded that feeding with P. somniforum pollen is slightly more advantageous than other feeding groups when the results of the pre-winter, winter and early spring periods are evaluated together. The ratio of bee frame value per hive to cover the production cost was calculated as 40.65% before winter, 102.98% in winter and 98.66% in early spring for the feeding with P. somniforum pollen. In terms of relative profitability, the protein diet with the closest performance to P. somniforum pollen is C. creticus pollen. In other feeding groups, the relative profitability was found to be lower.

Proje Numarası

TAGEM/HAYSÜD/B/20/A4/P5/1890

Kaynakça

  • Adanacıoglu, H., M. Kosoglu, G. Saner, E. Topal, B. Yucel. 2019. Economic feasibility of package beekeeping application in Turkey: A case study of Edirne province. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 25(5): 651-658.
  • Aksoy, A., M.M. Sarı, and M. Terin. 2017. Economic structure of beekeeping sector in Erzurum Province. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 434-440.
  • Akyol, E., H. Yeninar, N. Sahinler, and A. Guler A. 2006. The effects of additive feeding and feed additives before wintering on honey bee colony performances, wintering abilities and survival rates at the East Mediterranean region. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 9(4): 589-592.
  • Aleskerova, Y., and V. Todosiichuk. 2021. Analysis of economic aspects of organic beekeeping production. Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal. 2(1): 1-9.
  • Bianca, P.C., I. Marioara, and P.A. Aurora. 2011. Economic diagnosis of beekeeping in the North West region of Romania: a case study of Cluj County. Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Fascicula Ecotoxicologie, Zootehnie şi Tehnologii de Industrie alimentară. 10: 279-287.
  • Bixby, M., K. Baylis, S.E. Hoover, R.W. Currie, A.P. Melathopoulos, S.F. Pernal, L.J. Foster, and M.M. Guarna. 2017. A bio-economic case study of Canadian honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies: Marker-assisted selection (MAS) in queen breeding affects beekeeper profits. J Econ Entomol. 110: 816-825.
  • Blanc, S., F. Brun, G. Di Vita, and A. Mosso. 2018. Traditional beekeeping in rural areas: Profitability analysis and feasibility of pollination service. Qual. Access Success. 19: 72-79.
  • Bryś, M.S., P. Skowronek, and A. Strachecka. 2021. Pollen diet-properties and impact on a bee colony. Insects. 12(9), 798: 1-9.
  • Cejvanovic, F., Z. Grgic, A., Maksimovic, and D. Bicanic. 2011. Assumptions of economic model for sustainable productions of beekeeping in the Bosnia and Hercegovina. J. Agricultural Sci. Technol. 5(4): 481-485.
  • Cengiz, M.M., and C. Dülger. 2018. Gezginci ve sabit arıcılık işletmelerinde kontrollü şartlarda yetiştirilen ana arılarla oluşturulan balarısı (Apis mellifera L.) kolonilerinin bazı fizyolojik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bil. Derg. 13(1): 19-27.
  • Ceyhan, V., and S. Canan. 2017. Türkiye Arıcılarının koloni yönetim sistemleri itibariyle ekonomik performansı. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilim. Derg. 4(4): 516-522.
  • Islam, N., R. Mahmood, G. Sarwar, S. Ahmad, and S. Abid. 2020. Development of pollen substitute diets for Apis mellifera ligustica colonies and their impact on brood development and honey production. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 33(2): 381-388.
  • Jeločnik, M., B. Bekić, and J. Subić. 2013. Contribution margin in the mobile beekeeping on the territory of Pančevo city. Ekonomika. 59(2): 73-82.
  • Koprivlenski, V., V. Dirimanova, and V. Agapieva. 2015. Economic analysis of state and development of beekeeping in Bulgaria. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. 15(2): 167-170.
  • Kumar, M., D.P. Abrol, D. Sharma, U.S. Vikram, and A.K.Singh. 2021. Impact of artificial diets on performance of Apis mellifera colonies during dearth periods. J Entomol Zool Stud. 9(3):404-409.
  • Kumar, R., and O.P. Agrawal. 2014. Comparative performance of honeybee colonies fed with artificial diets in Gwalior & Panchkula region. J Entomol Zool Stud. 2(5):104-107.
  • Leonhardt, S.D., N. Gallai, L.A. Garibaldi, M. Kuhlmann, and A.M. Klein. 2013. Economic gain, stability of pollination and bee diversity decrease from southern to northern Europe. Basic Appl. Ecol. 14: 461-471.
  • Makri, P., P. Papanagiotou, and E. Papanagiotou. 2015. Efficiency and economic analysis of Greek beekeeping farms. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 21(3): 479-484.
  • Paray, B.A., I. Kumari, Y.A. Hajam, B. Sharma, R. Kumar, M.F. Albeshr, M.A. Farah, and J.M. Khan. 2021. Honeybee nutrition and pollen substitutes: A review. Saudi J Biol Sci. 28(1):1167-1176.
  • Pilati, L., and P. Fontana P. 2018. Sequencing the movements of honey bee colonies between the forage sites with the microeconomic model of the migratory beekeeper. pp. 1-20. In: R.E. Rebolledo Ranz (Ed). Apiculture, IntechOpen, London.
  • Saner, G., S. Engindeniz, B. Tolon, and F. Cukur. 2004. The economic analysis of beekeeping enterprise in sustainable development: The case study of Turkey. Apiacta. 38: 342-351.
  • Sihang, R.C., and M. Gupta. 2013. Testing the Effects of Some Pollen Substitute Diets on Colony Build up and Economics of Beekeeping with Apis mellifera L. J Entomol. 10(3): 120-135.
  • Somerville, D. 2000. Honey bee nutrition and supplementary feeding. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/117494/honey-bee-nutrition-supplementary-feeding.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022).
  • Somerville, D. 2010. Wintering bees. Available at: https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/331697/ Wintering-bees.pdf. (Accessed: 07.08.2022.
  • Thrasyvoulou, A. 1998. Practical apiculture. Melissokomiki epitheorisi. Apicultural Review. Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Topal, E., B. Yücel, R. İvgin Tunca, and M. Kösoğlu. 2019. Bal arılarında beslemenin koloni dinamiği üzerine etkileri. J. Inst. Sci. and Tech. 9(4): 2398-2408.
  • Ullah, A., M.F. Shahzad, I. Jamshaid, and M.S. Baloch. 2021. Nutritional effects of supplementary diets on brood development, biological activities and honey production of Apis mellifera L. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28(12): 6861-6868.
  • Vaziritabar, S., and S.M. Esmaeilzade. 2016. Profitability and socio-economic analysis of beekeeping and honey production in Karaj state, Iran. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 4(4): 1341-1350.
  • Vercelli, M., L. Croce, and T. Mancuso. 2020. An economic approach to assess the annual stock in beekeeping farms: The honey bee colony inventory tool. Sustainability. 12(21), 9258: 1-14.
  • Vrabcová, P., and M. Hájek. 2020. The economic value of the ecosystem services of beekeeping in the Czech Republic. Sustainability. 12(23), 10179: 1-11.
  • Zalilova, Z.A., A.G. Mannapov, M.T. Lukyanova, and V.A. Kovshov. 2021. Strategies of regional economic and sustainable development: The case of the beekeeping industry. pp. 855-862. In: A.V. Bogoviz (Ed.). The Challenge of Sustainability in Agricultural Systems, Springer, Cham.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği (Diğer)
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Hakan Adanacıoğlu 0000-0002-8439-8524

Mustafa Kösoğlu 0000-0001-6616-089X

Cristina Bianca Pocol 0000-0001-5079-8004

Veysel Bay 0000-0002-9339-4840

Erkan Topal 0000-0002-1398-4390

Proje Numarası TAGEM/HAYSÜD/B/20/A4/P5/1890
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 13 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 32 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Adanacıoğlu, H., Kösoğlu, M., Pocol, C. B., Bay, V., vd. (2022). Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed with Different Pollen Diets before Wintering. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 32(2), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1173055
AMA Adanacıoğlu H, Kösoğlu M, Pocol CB, Bay V, Topal E. Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed with Different Pollen Diets before Wintering. ANADOLU. Aralık 2022;32(2):217-227. doi:10.18615/anadolu.1173055
Chicago Adanacıoğlu, Hakan, Mustafa Kösoğlu, Cristina Bianca Pocol, Veysel Bay, ve Erkan Topal. “Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed With Different Pollen Diets before Wintering”. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 32, sy. 2 (Aralık 2022): 217-27. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1173055.
EndNote Adanacıoğlu H, Kösoğlu M, Pocol CB, Bay V, Topal E (01 Aralık 2022) Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed with Different Pollen Diets before Wintering. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 32 2 217–227.
IEEE H. Adanacıoğlu, M. Kösoğlu, C. B. Pocol, V. Bay, ve E. Topal, “Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed with Different Pollen Diets before Wintering”, ANADOLU, c. 32, sy. 2, ss. 217–227, 2022, doi: 10.18615/anadolu.1173055.
ISNAD Adanacıoğlu, Hakan vd. “Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed With Different Pollen Diets before Wintering”. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi 32/2 (Aralık 2022), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.1173055.
JAMA Adanacıoğlu H, Kösoğlu M, Pocol CB, Bay V, Topal E. Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed with Different Pollen Diets before Wintering. ANADOLU. 2022;32:217–227.
MLA Adanacıoğlu, Hakan vd. “Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed With Different Pollen Diets before Wintering”. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 32, sy. 2, 2022, ss. 217-2, doi:10.18615/anadolu.1173055.
Vancouver Adanacıoğlu H, Kösoğlu M, Pocol CB, Bay V, Topal E. Economic Analysis of Honey Bee Colonies Fed with Different Pollen Diets before Wintering. ANADOLU. 2022;32(2):217-2.
29899ANADOLU Journal by Aegean Agricultural Research Institute is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0  

30009     30010       30011     30012   30013      30014        30015  30016